| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Oracle Oracle9i Application Server 1.0.2.2 and 9.0.2 through 9.0.2.0.1, when running on Windows, allows remote attackers to retrieve files in the WEB-INF directory, which contains Java class files and configuration information, via a request to the WEB-INF directory with a trailing dot ("WEB-INF."). |
| The XML parser in Oracle 9i Application Server Release 2 9.0.3.0 and 9.0.3.1, 9.0.2.3 and earlier, and Release 1 1.0.2.2 and 1.0.2.2.2, and Database Server Release 2 9.2.0.1 and later, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via a SOAP message containing a crafted DTD. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in HTTP Server in Oracle Database Server 8i up to 10.1.0.4.2 and Application Server 1.0.2.2 up to 10.1.2.0 have unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# (1) DB30 and AS03 or (2) DB31 and AS05. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in OC4J for Oracle Application Server 9.0.2.3 and 9.0.3.1 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# AS02. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in OC4J for Oracle Application Server 9.0.2.3, 9.0.3.1, and 10.1.2.0.0 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# AS04. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in OC4J for Oracle Application Server 9.0.2.3, 9.0.3.1, 9.0.4.2, and 10.1.2.0.0 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# (1) AS05 and (2) AS08. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in OC4J for Oracle Application Server 10.1.3.0 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# AS09. |
| The default configuration of Oracle Application Server 9iAS 1.0.2.2 enables SOAP and allows anonymous users to deploy applications by default via urn:soap-service-manager and urn:soap-provider-manager. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in OC4J for Oracle Application Server 10.1.2.0.2 and 10.1.2.1 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# AS10. |
| Oracle 9i Application Server (Oracle9iAS) 9.0.2 allows remote attackers to poison the web cache, bypass web application firewall protection, and conduct XSS attacks via an HTTP request with both a "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" header and a Content-Length header, which causes Application Server to incorrectly handle and forward the body of the request in a way that causes the receiving server to process it as a separate HTTP request, aka "HTTP Request Smuggling." |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Oracle 9i Application Server Web Cache 9.0.4.0.0, 9.0.3.1.0, 9.0.2.3.0, and 9.0.0.4.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long HTTP request method header to the Web Cache listener. NOTE: due to the vagueness of the Oracle advisory, it is not clear whether there are additional issues besides this overflow, although the advisory alludes to multiple "vulnerabilities." |
| Server or client applications that call the SSL_check_chain() function during or after a TLS 1.3 handshake may crash due to a NULL pointer dereference as a result of incorrect handling of the "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. The crash occurs if an invalid or unrecognised signature algorithm is received from the peer. This could be exploited by a malicious peer in a Denial of Service attack. OpenSSL version 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, and 1.1.1f are affected by this issue. This issue did not affect OpenSSL versions prior to 1.1.1d. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1g (Affected 1.1.1d-1.1.1f). |
| Simultaneous Multi-threading (SMT) in processors can enable local users to exploit software vulnerable to timing attacks via a side-channel timing attack on 'port contention'. |
| The OpenSSL ECDSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). |
