Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Total
23252 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-26158 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux, Hummingbird | 2026-04-15 | 7 High |
| A flaw was found in BusyBox. This vulnerability allows an attacker to modify files outside of the intended extraction directory by crafting a malicious tar archive containing unvalidated hardlink or symlink entries. If the tar archive is extracted with elevated privileges, this flaw can lead to privilege escalation, enabling an attacker to gain unauthorized access to critical system files. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3296 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium |
| A timing-based side-channel flaw exists in the rust-openssl package, which could be sufficient to recover a plaintext across a network in a Bleichenbacher-style attack. To achieve successful decryption, an attacker would have to be able to send a large number of trial messages for decryption. The vulnerability affects the legacy PKCS#1v1.5 RSA encryption padding mode. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54661 | 2 Dest-unreach, Redhat | 4 Socat, Enterprise Linux, Rhel E4s and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| readline.sh in socat before1.8.0.2 relies on the /tmp/$USER/stderr2 file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24495 | 1 Redhat | 6 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 3 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.6 Medium |
| Incorrect initialization of resource in the branch prediction unit for some Intel(R) Core™ Ultra Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25209 | 1 Redhat | 1 Connectivity Link | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium |
| The AuthPolicy metadata on Red Hat Connectivity Link contains an object which stores secretes, however it assumes those secretes are already in the kuadrant-system instead of copying it to the referred namespace. This creates space for a malicious actor with a developer persona access to leak those secrets over HTTP connection, as long the attacker knows the name of the targeted secrets and those secrets are limited to one line only. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2201 | 1 Redhat | 4 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Els, Rhel Eus and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | 4.7 Medium |
| A cross-privilege Spectre v2 vulnerability allows attackers to bypass all deployed mitigations, including the recent Fine(IBT), and to leak arbitrary Linux kernel memory on Intel systems. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39333 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 2 Nodejs, Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Maliciously crafted export names in an imported WebAssembly module can inject JavaScript code. The injected code may be able to access data and functions that the WebAssembly module itself does not have access to, similar to as if the WebAssembly module was a JavaScript module. This vulnerability affects users of any active release line of Node.js. The vulnerable feature is only available if Node.js is started with the `--experimental-wasm-modules` command line option. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2877 | 1 Redhat | 2 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Ansible Automation Platform's Event-Driven Ansible. In configurations where verbosity is set to "debug", inventory passwords are exposed in plain text when starting a rulebook activation. This issue exists for any "debug" action in a rulebook and also affects Event Streams. | ||||
| CVE-2023-32251 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low |
| A vulnerability has been identified in the Linux kernel's ksmbd component (kernel SMB/CIFS server). A security control designed to prevent dictionary attacks, which introduces a 5-second delay during session setup, can be bypassed through the use of asynchronous requests. This bypass negates the intended anti-brute-force protection, potentially allowing attackers to conduct dictionary attacks more efficiently against user credentials or other authentication mechanisms. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6126 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-15 | 3.2 Low |
| A flaw was found in the cockpit package. This flaw allows an authenticated user to kill any process when enabling the pam_env's user_readenv option, which leads to a denial of service (DoS) attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8445 | 1 Redhat | 3 Directory Server, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Els | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium |
| The fix for CVE-2024-2199 in 389-ds-base was insufficient to cover all scenarios. In certain product versions, an authenticated user may cause a server crash while modifying `userPassword` using malformed input. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45337 | 1 Redhat | 15 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Cert Manager and 12 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| Applications and libraries which misuse connection.serverAuthenticate (via callback field ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback) may be susceptible to an authorization bypass. The documentation for ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback says that "A call to this function does not guarantee that the key offered is in fact used to authenticate." Specifically, the SSH protocol allows clients to inquire about whether a public key is acceptable before proving control of the corresponding private key. PublicKeyCallback may be called with multiple keys, and the order in which the keys were provided cannot be used to infer which key the client successfully authenticated with, if any. Some applications, which store the key(s) passed to PublicKeyCallback (or derived information) and make security relevant determinations based on it once the connection is established, may make incorrect assumptions. For example, an attacker may send public keys A and B, and then authenticate with A. PublicKeyCallback would be called only twice, first with A and then with B. A vulnerable application may then make authorization decisions based on key B for which the attacker does not actually control the private key. Since this API is widely misused, as a partial mitigation golang.org/x/cry...@v0.31.0 enforces the property that, when successfully authenticating via public key, the last key passed to ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback will be the key used to authenticate the connection. PublicKeyCallback will now be called multiple times with the same key, if necessary. Note that the client may still not control the last key passed to PublicKeyCallback if the connection is then authenticated with a different method, such as PasswordCallback, KeyboardInteractiveCallback, or NoClientAuth. Users should be using the Extensions field of the Permissions return value from the various authentication callbacks to record data associated with the authentication attempt instead of referencing external state. Once the connection is established the state corresponding to the successful authentication attempt can be retrieved via the ServerConn.Permissions field. Note that some third-party libraries misuse the Permissions type by sharing it across authentication attempts; users of third-party libraries should refer to the relevant projects for guidance. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2586 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift Lightspeed | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in the OpenShift Lightspeed Service, which is vulnerable to unauthenticated API request flooding. Repeated queries to non-existent endpoints inflate metrics storage and processing, consuming excessive resources. This issue can lead to monitoring system degradation, increased disk usage, and potential service unavailability. Since the issue does not require authentication, an external attacker can exhaust CPU, RAM, and disk space, impacting both application and cluster stability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-55565 | 1 Redhat | 11 Acm, Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery and 8 more | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| nanoid (aka Nano ID) before 5.0.9 mishandles non-integer values. 3.3.8 is also a fixed version. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0450 | 2 Python, Redhat | 7 Cpython, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 4 more | 2026-04-15 | 6.2 Medium |
| An issue was found in the CPython `zipfile` module affecting versions 3.12.1, 3.11.7, 3.10.13, 3.9.18, and 3.8.18 and prior. The zipfile module is vulnerable to “quoted-overlap” zip-bombs which exploit the zip format to create a zip-bomb with a high compression ratio. The fixed versions of CPython makes the zipfile module reject zip archives which overlap entries in the archive. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6861 | 1 Redhat | 4 Satellite, Satellite Capsule, Satellite Maintenance and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A disclosure of sensitive information flaw was found in foreman via the GraphQL API. If the introspection feature is enabled, it is possible for attackers to retrieve sensitive admin authentication keys which could result in a compromise of the entire product's API. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2947 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High |
| A flaw was found in Cockpit. Deleting a sosreport with a crafted name via the Cockpit web interface can lead to a command injection vulnerability, resulting in privilege escalation. This issue affects Cockpit versions 270 and newer. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45769 | 1 Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Performance Co-Pilot (PCP). This flaw allows an attacker to send specially crafted data to the system, which could cause the program to misbehave or crash. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4027 | 1 Redhat | 17 Amq Streams, Apache Camel Hawtio, Build Keycloak and 14 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Undertow. Servlets using a method that calls HttpServletRequestImpl.getParameterNames() can cause an OutOfMemoryError when the client sends a request with large parameter names. This issue can be exploited by an unauthorized user to cause a remote denial-of-service (DoS) attack. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2487 | 1 Redhat | 4 Directory Server, Directory Server Eus, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the 389-ds-base LDAP Server. This issue occurs when issuing a Modify DN LDAP operation through the ldap protocol, when the function return value is not tested and a NULL pointer is dereferenced. If a privileged user performs a ldap MODDN operation after a failed operation, it could lead to a Denial of Service (DoS) or system crash. | ||||