Total
8511 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-13179 | 1 Bdtask | 2 Wholesale, Wholesale Inventory Control And Inventory Management System | 2025-11-24 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been found in Bdtask/CodeCanyon Wholesale Inventory Control and Inventory Management System up to 20250320. This issue affects some unknown processing. Such manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62346 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Glovius Cloud | 2025-11-24 | 6.8 Medium |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in HCL Glovius Cloud. An attacker can force a user's web browser to execute an unwanted, malicious action on a trusted site where the user is authenticated, specifically on one endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66064 | 2 Rafflepress, Wordpress | 3 Giveaways And Contests, Giveaways And Contests By Rafflepress, Wordpress | 2025-11-24 | 5.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Syed Balkhi Giveaways and Contests by RafflePress rafflepress allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Giveaways and Contests by RafflePress: from n/a through <= 1.12.20. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66097 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-24 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Igor Jerosimić I Order Terms i-order-terms allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects I Order Terms: from n/a through <= 1.5.0. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5455 | 3 Fedoraproject, Freeipa, Redhat | 25 Fedora, Freeipa, Codeready Linux Builder and 22 more | 2025-11-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| A Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ipa/session/login_password in all supported versions of IPA. This flaw allows an attacker to trick the user into submitting a request that could perform actions as the user, resulting in a loss of confidentiality and system integrity. During community penetration testing it was found that for certain HTTP end-points FreeIPA does not ensure CSRF protection. Due to implementation details one cannot use this flaw for reflection of a cookie representing already logged-in user. An attacker would always have to go through a new authentication attempt. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63955 | 1 Phpgurukul | 1 Student Record System | 2025-11-20 | 7.5 High |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the manage-students.php component of PHPGurukul Student Record System v3.2 allows an attacker to trick an authenticated administrator into submitting a forged request. This leads to the unauthorized deletion of user accounts, causing a Denial of Service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2025-12535 | 2 Brainstormforce, Wordpress | 2 Sureforms, Wordpress | 2025-11-20 | 5.3 Medium |
| The SureForms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.13.1. This is due to the plugin distributing generic WordPress REST API nonces (wp_rest) to unauthenticated users via the 'wp_ajax_nopriv_rest-nonce' action. While the plugin legitimately needs to support unauthenticated form submissions, it incorrectly uses generic REST nonces instead of form-specific nonces. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bypass CSRF protection on REST API endpoints that rely solely on nonce verification without additional authentication checks, allowing them to trigger unauthorized actions such as the plugin's own post-submission hooks and potentially other plugins' REST endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60075 | 2 Allegro Marketing, Wordpress | 2 Hpb Seo Plugin For Wordpress, Wordpress | 2025-11-19 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Allegro Marketing hpb seo plugin for WordPress hpbseo allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects hpb seo plugin for WordPress: from n/a through <= 3.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12406 | 2 Awensley, Wordpress | 2 Project Honey Pot Spam Trap, Wordpress | 2025-11-19 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Project Honey Pot Spam Trap plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the printAdminPage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12173 | 2 Winkm89, Wordpress | 2 Wp Admin Microblog, Wordpress | 2025-11-19 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP Admin Microblog plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'wp-admin-microblog' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to send messages on behalf of an administrator via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63712 | 2 Senior-walter, Sourcecodester | 2 Web-based Pharmacy Product Management System, Product Expiry Management System | 2025-11-18 | 4.5 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in SourceCodester Product Expiry Management System. The User Management module (delete-user.php) allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary user accounts via forged cross-origin GET requests because the endpoint relies solely on session cookies and lacks CSRF protection. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9625 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-11-18 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Coil Web Monetization plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the coil-get-css-selector parameter handling in the maybe_restrict_content function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger CSS selector detection functionality via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63717 | 2 Mayurik, Sourcecodester | 2 Pet Grooming Management Software, Pet Grooming Management Software | 2025-11-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| The change password functionality at /pet_grooming/admin/change_pass.php in SourceCodester Pet Grooming Management Software 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. The application does not implement adequate anti-CSRF tokens or same-site cookie restrictions, allowing attackers to trick authenticated users into unknowingly changing their passwords. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63716 | 2 Rems, Sourcecodester | 2 Leads Manager Tool, Leads Manager Tool | 2025-11-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| The SourceCodester Leads Manager Tool v1.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks that allow unauthorized state-changing operations. The application lacks CSRF protection mechanisms such as anti-CSRF tokens or same-origin verification for critical endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2023-53688 | 1 Nagios | 2 Nagios Xi, Xi | 2025-11-17 | 5.4 Medium |
| Nagios XI versions prior to 5.11.3 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) and cross-site request forgery (CSRF) via the Hypermap Replay component. An attacker can submit crafted input that is not properly validated or escaped, allowing injection of malicious script that executes in the context of a victim's browser (XSS). Additionally, the component does not enforce sufficient anti-CSRF protections on state-changing operations, enabling an attacker to induce authenticated users to perform unwanted actions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63710 | 2 Pijey, Sourcecodester | 2 Simple Public Chat Room, Simple Public Chat Room | 2025-11-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| The send_message.php endpoint in SourceCodester Simple Public Chat Room 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The application does not implement any CSRF-protection mechanisms such as tokens, nonces, or same-site cookie restrictions. An attacker can create a malicious HTML page that, when visited by an authenticated user, will automatically submit a forged POST request to the vulnerable endpoint. This request will be executed with the victim's privileges, allowing the attacker to perform unauthorized actions on their behalf, such as sending arbitrary messages in any chat room. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63711 | 2 Lerouxyxchire, Sourcecodester | 2 Client Database Management System, Client Database Management System | 2025-11-17 | 7.1 High |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the SourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0 allows an attacker to cause an authenticated administrative user to perform user deletion actions without their consent. The application's user deletion endpoint (e.g., superadmin_user_delete.php) accepts POST requests containing a user_id parameter and does not enforce request origin or anti-CSRF tokens. Because the endpoint lacks proper authentication/authorization checks and CSRF protections, a remote attacker can craft a malicious page that triggers deletion when visited by an authenticated admin, resulting in arbitrary removal of user accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13119 | 3 Fabian, Fabianros, Sourcecodester | 3 Simple E-banking System, Simple E-banking System, Simple Cafe Billing System | 2025-11-17 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw has been found in Fabian Ros/SourceCodester Simple E-Banking System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58469 | 1 Qnap | 1 Qulog Center | 2025-11-14 | 8.8 High |
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been reported to affect QuLog Center. The remote attackers can then exploit the vulnerability to gain privileges or hijack user identities. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: QuLog Center 1.8.2.927 ( 2025/09/17 ) and later | ||||
| CVE-2025-64482 | 1 Enalean | 1 Tuleap | 2025-11-14 | 4.6 Medium |
| Tuleap is an Open Source Suite to improve management of software developments and collaboration. Tuleap Community Edition prior to version 16.13.99.1762267347 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition prior to versions 17.01-, 16.13-6, and 16.12-9 don't have cross-site request forgery protections in the file release system. An attacker could use this vulnerability to trick victims into changing the commit rules or immutable tags of a SVN repo. Tuleap Community Edition 16.13.99.1762267347, Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.0-1, Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.13-6, and Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.12-9 fix the issue. | ||||